Avatars & Personas: Good, Bad , Or Somewhere in Between?
This is the 35th edition of Phil Friedman and my He Said He Said cross-border discourse. You can find a number of our most recent posts on our BeBee publisher pages.
JIM: In your last email to me you expressed a concert that the posts you had been seeing from me on social media have been kinda dark and wondered if I was OK. My response to you was that I was actually very happy, and that the darkness you saw was really more a persona than a reflection of my true character.
This has always be something I have been curious about, especially in social media. How many people are actually creating personas and why they do that?
For you and I as writers, this is often necessary. I have spent most of my advertising career and a lot of my hobby-time fiction writing in voices that were not my own.
A lot of the great works of fiction were created in such voices.
I remember when I read Moby Dick by Hermann Melville. He established the persona he was writing in probably better than anyone has ever done it in three simple words, “Call me Ishmael”. For whatever reason, it sucked me right into the book.
The Boomer is a character I created a while back as an experiment, mostly to see if I wrote differently in the third person than I did in the first. And I did. And more than that, I liked it. There’s a freedom to writing that way that’s very alluring.
So, my question to you, Mr. Boat Boy, Esq., is this. Do we always have to be ourselves or is it beneficial to have an avatar or two, to provide you with a different way to communicate?
PHIL: That’s an interesting question, Jiminy Clicket, especially since you well know that I’ve written a fair amount of satire, political and social, using the pseudonym and avatar of Jim Able.In fact, Jim Able was at one point quite active on LinkedIn and was racking up thousands of views and hundreds of followers — until, that is, he crossed the LI Gods by questioning the veracity of many LinkedIn profiles, especially those of people who claimed to be CEOs ( http://linkedinjustice.blogspot.com ) and was summarily booted off the platform for using a nom de plume and an avatar.
My use of a pseudonym and an avatar accomplished several objectives, although not the one that most people thought of. I did not use Jim Able as a way of hiding who I was, but rather as a means for keeping my more informal and socially irreverent writings separated from my business-oriented social media profiles and isolated from the growing number of Google and other search engine citations for “phil friedman yacht” which were helping significantly with my personal branding and core business marketing.
I didn’t — and still don’t — care if my business contacts found out I was Jim Able; I just didn’t want Jim Able’s satire and irreverent political bombast to turn them off before they learned about my professional and business background and the things I do in the course of my marine industry and small-business consulting.
I mention all this, however, not to rehash the old grievance(s) but to point out that I can answer your question authentically based on my own experience. And the answer is yes, I found that not only did I write in a voice different from my normal persona but found myself thinking differently as I did so. Moreover, when I was writing as Jim Able, I actually felt as though I were a different person.
Which raises a question in response to your question, James, me boy: As writers, we frequently talk about “authenticity” but do you think you can authentically employ more than a single persona?
JIM: Well, to answer your question, you could argue that Jim Able managed to do that successfully and authentically for quite some time. And I believe it was successful because you were never really trying to con anyone into believing that Jim Able was not you.The other thing I am coming to believe is that social media in general is a bit of a joke, since there really are no hard and fast rules of behaviour. For this reason, you see a countless number of assholes hiding behind some persona or made up name that they think is cool, but which, in reality, simply allows them to gross people out, slander, malign, troll and generally kick up shit without any real fear of banishment, because they can simply come back as something else.
There are a lot of people who create these Jim Able type personas. Back in the day, I used to use the pen name Jake Morrison for a while. He was mostly responsible for poetry, which, at the time, I wasn’t all that good at or confident about. And so, I used that name to kind of hide my own identity. But one day I woke up and thought…for chrissake, dude, stand behind your work, and so Jake was put out to pasture.
As far as authenticity goes, I’m not really sure whether Jim Able was able to achieve the same level of it as Phil Friedman. But he came damns close, and that’s good enough for me. In social media writing I believe that you are really doing yourself a disservice by assuming an alter ego, because (and honestly your Jim Able thing was an exception, and let’s face it, everybody who mattered knew it was you) anything that you do to attempt to hide who you really are, I believe, will be seen as a form of deceit and that’s never good for anybody’s brand, personal or otherwise.
I believe that any professional writer who uses social media as a medium for their message should make sure, at the very least that their readers know who they are and what they believe.
But since you are really the only guy I know who as pulled off two separate personas, I’d be interested in your opinion of that.
PHIL: Look, most of the time, I don’t really know what to make of all of this. What I do know is that adopting different “personas” in different writing situations is often confused in social media circles with faking profiles and acting the troll from behind a mask of anonymity. But they are, in fact, not the same at all.Using a pseudonym (nom de plume) is a time-honored literary tradition — which is something social media types would know if they ever bothered to read anything serious. Samuel Clemens did it when he wrote and spoke as Mark Twain. David John Moore Cornwell did it when he authored works as John le Carre. And Joanne Rowling (aka J. K. Rowling) did it when she wrote as Robert Galbraith. These particular writers all had different reasons for using pseudonyms and adopting different personas, but those reasons did not include a primary desire to fool or mislead.
Jimmy -san, I think you come pretty close to the heart of the matter when you say “… Jim Able was able to achieve the same level of [authenticity] … as Phil Friedman … because, well. that’s who you are.”
The point is that Jim Able was not a faked profile, intended to shield the user from exposure. Rather, he was an alter-ego — the expression of an aspect of my personality that I usually kept from public view in my published writing.
I guess the upshot of all this is that a lot about personas and pseudonyms depends on the purpose(s) for which they are adopted. If the intention behind the usage is nefarious, then the usage is to be condemned. But if the intention behind the usage falls within the realm of good reason(s), then readers should, I think, accept it at face value.
JIM: Yeah, I agree. Most people are actually just looking for a good takeaway. Maybe an insight or two and the chance to learn something new that they could use themselves. Or maybe just even to be entertained.One of the big issues that’s getting a lot of attention these days is cyber bullying. And this is one of the places where people hide behind fake names and are protected from blowback by their anonymity. It’s a sad statement on our society in general that there is so much bullying and trolling and just plain cruelty being exhibited.
Last night I wrote a post in LinkedIn about how I was tired of being trolled by alt-righters, and was thinking of cutting back my frequency of Anti-45 posts. This response (I won’t post the name) really speaks volumes about what if going on, not just in America, but the world, right now. Obviously this guy has been seeing a whole lot more than I have.
“I don't know what it must feel like to an outsider looking in, but from an Insider looking out, it is unbelievable. I can't believe the stupidity. I can't believe the depravity. I can't believe the ignorance. I can't believe the hate. I can't believe the bigotry. I can't believe the lies. I can't believe the excess. I can't believe the despair. I can't believe the hopelessness. I can't believe the loss. I can't believe the rage. I can't believe the results of the election. I can't believe the polls. I can't believe a word that this Administration utters. I can't believe what this man gets away with. I can't believe the powerlessness to stop him. I can't believe the weakness of the press. I can't believe the powers of redress. I can't believe who I Have Become. I can't believe how many hours I spend worrying about what's going to happen. I can't believe how much time I spend on my phone looking for news. I can't believe that we are really this divided. I can't believe how much doubt I have about things with which there used to be no doubt. I can't believe how much fear I have. I can't believe that this list will ever end.”
This is the sense of disbelief that is engendered in good people, as a result of watching people spew venom, mostly anonymously, on social media. It is truly weakening the fabric of society. And I know that the majority of this simply would not exist if not for the anonymity that social media offers.
But I guess we have to take the bad with the good. For every Mark Twain. There’s a DeathToLibtards. It sucks. But it is what it is.
Jim lives in St Catharines Ontario and is a partner at Bullet Proof Consulting. www.bulletproofconsulting.ca
You can follow Jim
On beBee: https://www.bebee.com/bee/jim-murray
On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jim-murray-b8a3a4/
On Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jimbobmur
On Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/y97gxro4
"""""""
Articles from Jim Murray
View blogThe last couple of decades in the life of planet Earth have been very strange ones indeed. · As a wr ...
I have been ‘retired’ for about seven years now. But by no means have I stopped writing. No. Writing ...
Preface: For those who may not know, over a period of three years a while back, Phil Friedman and I ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
-
General Counsel
Found in: Talent CA C2 - 3 weeks ago
SAIT Calgary, Canada TEMPORARYSAIT is a global leader in applied education and an institution that empowers employees to make a difference in the lives of our students. Building on more than a century of history, we are looking for innovative employees wanting to create a future with us. As part of our team, ...
-
Contrôleur adjoint
Found in: Talent CA C2 - 2 hours ago
Quantum Montreal, Canada PermanentPoste : contrôleur adjoint · Lieu de travail : Montréal - métro Jean-Talon · Salaire : $ à $ par an · Notre client, une entreprise en pleine expansion dans le domaine de l'immobilier, est à la recherche d'un contrôleur adjoint dynamique pour se joindre à son bureau adjacent au ce ...
-
cleaner
Found in: Talent CA 2 C2 - 10 hours ago
125790 BC Ltd. Surrey, CanadaEducation: No degree, certificate or diploma · Experience: 2 years to less than 3 years · Tasks · Sweep, mop, wash and polish floors · Dust furniture · Vacuum carpeting, area rugs, draperies and upholstered furniture · Clean, disinfect and polish kitchen and bathroom fixtures and ...
Comments
Pascal Derrien
5 years ago #20
Milos Djukic
5 years ago #19
Phil Friedman, my No-Muzak friend. I belong to the category of these fake characters, which are wanna be professors. Actually, I am just an ugly fractal, then and now even more. Some people even use fake images of other people within their profiles on social media. As you perfectly pointed out, "we don’t know their circumstances, or their demons". It is even more important if we are able to control well our demons. Because fractals are able.
Lada 🏡 Prkic
5 years ago #18
You're right. I forget that we all have our demons, big or small.
Harvey Lloyd
5 years ago #17
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #16
Lada \ud83c\udfe1 Prkic, I think there couldbemany reasons. But I agree with you that, in the circustances youdescribe, those reasons all contain an element of fear. I prefer to stand with people who are prepared to stand behind what they say, but I am reluctant to judge those who are not. For we don’t know their circumstanes, or their demons. I never, however, sign a petition for or express solidarity with a person who chooses to remain anonymous. ... PS- Glad you read my part I. I don’t know how it got deleted. Probably a slip of my thumb on my iPhone.
Lada 🏡 Prkic
5 years ago #15
Phil, all you said is true (I've read the first part also). But my question was about people who hide behind a moniker on social media. I think I know at least one person on this platform. And I don't think of Jim Able which is something way different. :-) What's wrong with sharing views openly under the real name, unless there were some life-threatened reasons that justified it. I read one statement that people of courage and ethics do not hide behind pseudonyms and monikers on social media. Maybe a bit harsh but makes you think.
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #14
Lada \ud83c\udfe1 Prkic -- I believe that one can only be 100% certain in a very small percentage of cases. For example, I've met my fellow Beezers in person and am confident that they are pretty much who they say they are. For among other things, nobody could fake being that crazy. I think there are other signs as well, primarily attributions of very public and verifiable background details that could be checked, for example, degrees from accredited mainline institutions or job histories with companies that have appeared in news articles that can be found in an online search. Of course, nothing is 100% certain, when it comes to the digital world. And someone with enough experience and talent can fake a lot. But consider, if you will, whether you know even your face-to-face friends and acquaintances and fellow workers 100%. How many times in your life have you been surprised by someone's actions or hidden beliefs (e.g., leaving their long-time spouse for a paramour or disclosing a hidden history of domestic violence or a belief in hearing voices from Mars). (continued ... Pt. II)
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #13
Lada 🏡 Prkic
5 years ago #12
Javier Cámara-Rica 🐝🇪🇸
5 years ago #11
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #10
I agree, Jerry Fletcher, it’s a matter of context, intent, and need. I think readers on social media are less tolerant of the use of pseudonyms because on social media too many seem to have a need to preserve the self-delusion that they really know those with whom they engage. Why are so many troubled by the use if a pseudonym, yet not by the myriad of phony self-ascriptions of titles and certifications? Or the vast number of diploma mill MBAs? Do you know there is even a faurly frequent publisher and Brand Ambassador on beBee who claims an advaced graduate degree — awarded him by the private, non-accredted school the HE owns. What kinda BS is that? And why is the writer who uses a pseudonym less honest? At least with a writer, what you read is what you get. And one’s work stands or falls on its own. Cheers!
Jerry Fletcher
5 years ago #9
Jim Murray
5 years ago #8
You guessed it Randall. And we really think you're cute in your sexy little chef's hat.
Jim Murray
5 years ago #7
Oooops, just saw that. I
Jim Murray
5 years ago #6
Hmm. I checked it out and it looks OK to me.
Jim Murray
5 years ago #5
Yeah, I know. Their programming is f'd up.
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #4
In fact, Randall Burns, I am Graham Kerr on a mission to steal your best proprietary recipes and mount a comeback. Cheers!
Randall Burns
5 years ago #3
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #2
Phil Friedman
5 years ago #1