Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago · 3 min. reading time · 0 ·

Blogging
>
Graham🐝 blog
>
Execution... the first in a series of thoughts

Execution... the first in a series of thoughts


"Plan your work and work your plan"... simple, pithy, insightful, and used around the world. 

ccicon: 1s nev

n accident; it is the
result of high
intention, sincere
effort, intelligent
direction, skillful
axecution and the
ion to see obstaclIf you are not doing this then what are you doing? 


But what if you are doing this with all the effort and gusto you have, and still everything goes terribly wrong — I mean horribly (just awfully) wrong. The sun will still rise the next day in the east as it always does and you will want to (or have to) figure out what went wrong.

You had a plan and you worked the plan... so what happened?" 

This is one of those "galvanizing topics" that pits those who plan strategically against those who execute tactically — it can be great fun to get popcorn and watch the bun fight, unless of course you are in the middle of it, and then it's not as much fun. I want to point out that when I say "went wrong" I am not suggesting measuring to perfection* but rather measured against targeted expectations. Now back to the question at hand — was it a "poor plan that was executed well or a great plan that was executed poorly?" 

To try and scratch at the answer to this and glean some understanding, I have a "little case study" to entertain us all.

A friend told me about the following and I have no doubt that it reflects a real situation—

A medium sized company wanted to launch a new product (a line extender). Prior to the launch date an informational YouTube video was launched which contained a call to action website address at the end (an important note to set the stage is the web page was not active). When marketing was informed they quickly activated the web page with a "Coming Soon" message. As part of the product launch, there was a sampling campaign that was highlighted on the new web page encouraging customers to request a sample. When a customer clicked on the request sample icon, the customer was taken to a page where there was no mention of the new product sample (or the ability to order one). Marketing was once again informed and two days later the web page was updated allowing the a customer to request a sample of the product and receive it once officially launched. This all happened one month before the official product launch (as god is my witness this is what I was told). It was also indicated to me that the product revenue following the official launch did not meet expectations.


I was not there but as an observer and taking the story at face value, I think it is fair to say this was a bit of an "execution shit show". I can only speculate on the reasons (and hey, why not)?

  • In all of this there was no thought or consideration to the customer, particularly with developing expectations that could not be met.
  • It seems there was no coordinated rollout plan integrating the various communication channels and activities.
  • There seems to be no operational process (or governance) in place to ensure activities stay controlled (and within expectations).
  • Quite possibly this reflects a fragmented marketing function with different agendas.

I will go out on a limb here and say that the execution of the new product was "sub optimal". I do suspect that someone, somewhere, had some more "choice words" (at least I would hope so).


Now back to the aforementioned bun fight 

I think those who strategically determined the need for the new product launch have every right to throw the buns a little harder in this situation — but there is something hidden in this tale, that will never be discovered. How do we know that the new product wasn't destined to be a dud; all that time and those resources wasted because there was no market interest? Simply wasting time and resources because of an irrelevant line extender... this we will never know.

It is said that ruthlessly effective execution is needed to be successful (as well as differentiating) in an ever-growing competitive environment. 

I would also suggest that optimizing your ability to execute is imperative for determining if your strategic direction hits the mark, needs course correction, or a complete overhaul. Since strategy is reliant on effective execution, the burden falls on those who execute and those who manage execution. It is also easier to start with optimizing your ability to execute effectively, as more often than not, it consists of internal variables making control and measurement easier**.

I have been doing this long enough to know when "an idea" will just not work, but in that same breath, I also know to keep my mouth shut until I can say that execution was optimal. 

Then I pick up a bun.


iamgpe

* To be chased but never obtained.

** Optimizing execution is relatively easier, because most aspects are within your control such as process, resources, training, governance, and with shorter timeframes it allows for effective measurement against KPIs (Key performance Indicators). Strategy tends to have a broader macro perspective with longer time frames that are influenced by both internal and external parameters.


"
Comments

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #5

#3
Thanks for reading Debasish Majumder

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #4

#2
Thanks for the comment Jerry Fletcher... that's a great addition, and a sad example where marketing actually has forgotten what is at the core of what they do...

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #3

#1
Thanks for the comment @ Bernard Poulin... these are great points. Whether it is true or not I have heard in every beautiful and elaborate Chinese carpet the weaver incorporated a flaw because the belief is only god is perfect.... The carpet is still beautiful!

Debasish Majumder

6 years ago #2

nice insight Graham\ud83d\udc1d Edwards! enjoyed read and shared.thank you for the share.

Jerry Fletcher

6 years ago #1

Grant, I stopped counting new product intros at 207. Your observations are spot on. I would add one that I've seen too many times. The product developed was based on an inaccurate assessment of the customer's desires. (In one example focus group analysis was rejected by a brand manager. The loss was calculated in millions.)

Articles from Graham🐝 Edwards

View blog
1 year ago · 1 min. reading time

Social media feeds are filled with the anticipation of a new year and all the best wishes that come ...

2 years ago · 3 min. reading time

Recently I thought I had reached a level of wisdom that I could offer thoughts on a number of things ...

2 years ago · 2 min. reading time

It’s one of those books that is dense with information — not hard to comprehend but contains so much ...

Related professionals

You may be interested in these jobs

  • IDEKA Services Conseils

    Emploi test

    Found in: Talent CA C2 - 1 week ago


    IDEKA Services Conseils Montreal, Canada

    "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in volup ...

  • Enbridge

    Functional Analyst II

    Found in: Talent CA C2 - 2 days ago


    Enbridge Toronto, Canada Full time

    Posting End Date: · March 28, 2024 Employee Type: · Regular-Full time Union/Non: · This is a non-union position This position will provide functional solution expertise to the AWM functional work stream within the CBS TIS operations team. This is a key role to help defin ...

  • NS KT Foods Inc.

    cook

    Found in: Talent CA 2 C2 - 6 days ago


    NS KT Foods Inc. Winnipeg, Canada

    Education: Secondary (high) school graduation certificate · Experience: 1 year to less than 2 years · Tasks · Prepare and cook complete meals or individual dishes and foods · Train staff in preparation, cooking and handling of food · Supervise kitchen staff and helpers · Maintain ...