Jim Murray

7 years ago · 3 min. reading time · 0 ·

Blogging
>
Jim blog
>
The American Odyssey Continues…Brand Versus Brand

The American Odyssey Continues…Brand Versus Brand

Meet The New Boss
Nothing Like The Old BossWell the US Presidential race is over. And I have to say it’s a bit of a relief. I actually feel like I have huge hangover from all of this bullshit. Fifteen months of it.
I tend to get caught up in these things like a lot of writers do. And I tend to take sides, like a lot of writers should. But honestly, it was tough sledding this time around.
This election wasn’t about left wing versus right wing. It wasn’t about moderate versus extremist. It wasn’t even about man versus women.
It was about brand versus brand. It was a battle that was waged in the media. It was a test of strength and a personality contest. And if you look at it objectively, the strongest brand won.
Now it’s a real source of sadness that life in the United States has come down to this. Mainly because what was really lost in this shitstorm of brand versus brand were the issues.
The election should have been about which candidate can do the best job of nursing the country back to health. It should have been about what was necessary to do that effectively. And it should have been about how far the United States has made it back from the worst economic crisis since the great depression.
But no…It was about anything but.
Branding Is About The Impression You Make

The Trump brand managed to create the impression that America was pretty much fucked. And that they were pretty much fucked because of the corruption that existed in Washington.
The trouble with that is that is was probably true. But the reality of it was that it was mainly corrupt Republicans in the congress and senate whose agenda was being dictated to them by special interests and the racial hatred they felt for the democratic president.
This issue was raised by a number of people, but never got any traction because it was overpowered by the sexier promises of a Mexican wall and mass deportations of all those terrorists, murderers and rapists that have been polluting the country for decades.
It was skillful marketing in the extreme, because it drew people’s attention to non-issues and away of the real ones.
All through the campaign Trump played the schoolyard bully and beat up on everyone who got in his way. And people obviously forgave him a lot because he was ‘inexperienced’ and ‘not a politician’. Brilliant positioning again.
What this did, in addition to pumping up the Trump brand, was successfully re-position Hillary Clinton as the Washington Establishment brand.
The Trump brand knew that the sluts of the news media would be more attracted to his brand than they would the Hillary brand, because the Trump brand was outrageous. The Trump brand was irreverent. The Trump brand blew smoke up everybody’s skirt and did it very skillfully.
It was a bit of a gamble, but what did he have to lose?

On The Other Side

Hillary Clinton, or any other sane establishment politician, didn’t stand a chance.
The Democratic party gave the Trump brand the election on a silver platter when they screwed over Bernie Sanders, who was really the only viable Democratic candidate that could have stood up to the Trump brand.
Because the Bernie Sanders brand was heroic. The Bernie Sanders brand had the hearts and minds of the young and the disenfranchised, and probably their parents too.
But the Trump brand seized on a single phrase ‘Social Democrat’ and turned that into another word for ‘Communist’. And that was the end of that for the Sanders brand. Because no American likes a Commie.

The Bulletproof Drumph

The Trump brand succeeded because it was basically bulletproof. The strategy to keep it that way was simple. Just lie. And keep lying. If you lie enough people will start believing it’s true.
Because there are a lot of people out there who are intellectually incapable of going deep. And the ones who are are probably party loyalists and will understand that you’re lying your ass off to get the party in power again.
Last night was the proof that the Trump brand outperformed the Hillary brand. Not by much, but it didn’t need much.
As a marketing and branding person I am in awe of what the Trump brand pulled off. As a human being I am completely disgusted by how they did it.
They gamed the American public, counting on their ignorance, promoting racial and a whole lot of other kinds of hatred and the ineffectiveness of the Washington establishment.
They shouted long and they shouted hard. They lied like rugs. They made it acceptable for people to think like them, and the rest they just wore out, like cops will do when they interrogate a murder suspect. They created a cultural-based Stockholm Syndrome on a mass scale.
And goddam it, it worked.

Be Careful What You Wish For

The only downside is that now you have a President who is determined to turn a whole large country on its head. You have a president who, if nothing else, has proven that his agenda really starts and ends with himself.
You’re giving him a huge benefit of the doubt.
This is a classic case of ‘be careful what you wish for’, because those stories hardly ever end with the phrase, 'and they all lived happily ever after.’

to provoke thought and revive the comatose
If your business has reached the point where talking to a communication professional would be the preferred option to banging your head against the wall or whatever, lets talk.

Download my free ebook, Small Business Communication For The Real World, here:

https://onwordsandupwords.wordpress.com/2013/11/24/small-business-communications-for-the-real-world/


All my profile and contact information can be accessed here:
https://www.bebee.com/producer/@jim-murray/this-post-is-my-about-page


All content copyright 2016 Jim Murray


""
Comments

Harvey Lloyd

7 years ago #20

#26
To repeat what President Obama stated in January 2009, Trump won. Your argument lacks credibility when compared to the other choice in this election. I agree with your comments, but repeating them over and over doesn't change this fact. You have assumed that i voted for Trump in your diatribe without any facts. You have associated me and others, 40 million to be close, with hating others, sexual mis-conduct, and generally deplorable. So i would ask, given this opinion, opportunity to act out your comments and the assumption you represent a majority of the democrat position, What should happen to the deplorables?

Philippe Collard

7 years ago #19

#25
Harvey Lloyd. Sensible political discussions, right. Well, well, well. Let us turn to D Trump for that and try to analyze how he has led in that regard over the past 18 months. Let's start with "Mexicans are rapists and drgu dealers. Some are OK". Or "let us ban all the Muslims from entering the country". Or again "HRC deserved to be in jail" (while forgeting the many things that should have landed him in said jail. Or "Crooked Hillary", a perfect example of civil political discourse (Il will spare you the other eptiteth he has used over the past year)..what about "Lock her up"...what about "If I am elected, I am going to name a special prosecutor to look into your situation"...so please, pretty please, with sugar on top, give me a big break with the civilities. But here is the thing, those who voted for him knew exactly what he is, what he stands for, what he does not know, his crass manipulation of the truth (fact checkers clocked him at one lie per 45 seconds during his "speeches") and yet they voted for him. So did millions of people in Germany voted for Hitler n 1933. Same folks, who years later, after WWII said "We did not know" or "We did not understand". I am sorry but if you desire the right to vote, then you must accept the consequences. And yes, if you vote for a con man, knowing full well he is a con man, then you send a very loud and clear message: I am very OK with a con man as POTUS. It is actually way beyond guilt by association. It is a very pro-active behavior. You have one vote. And you cast that vote for someone like Trump. Well, you PICKED him. There is no "association" here...it was YOUR CHOICE!

Harvey Lloyd

7 years ago #18

#22
The questions were not rhetorical @Philippe Collard. You lost me at condemnation by association. The Romans too, thought they were progressive and had arrived at the pentacle of civilization. I make no such charge. We as a nation have not arrived, rather stand at a crossroads of decisions. Republicans, Democrats and Independents all have their ideas of our future. We need to choose wisely. Within the three dimensions lies the answers to a civilization that fails or succeeds. Given the choices of leadership i am challenged by the fact we cant have civil discourse about the next 100 years. Each person had to decide based on the given choices. I sense that many were disenfranchised on both sides. We can battle our positions with wisdom or continue with MAD "Mutually Assured Destruction". I choose battling within a construct of open debate. Unfortunately open debate is met with sophomoric rhetoric of accusation and innuendo that brings us no closer to answers than nuclear weapons. Should we choose the latter course the losing side in the political debate will rise up. In reality, it doesn't matter who rises, America will suffer as a country. "if you do not even realize that you are being used, you do not deserve your freedom" Your quote is appropriate, Americans on both sides of this discussion have been lead down a path of polarization as a method of representation. I am refusing to participate. The "use" is within the participation. If your use of the quote implies that i do not deserve my freedom because you believe i am guilty through association, then we are all doomed to the mistakes of our past. Bring on McCarthy. This time it will be a Democrat. Same history different party. See you on the political battlefield, i will be the "uneducated white man" in the corner seeking understanding of wise choices for all Americans.

Phil Friedman

7 years ago #17

#22
Phillippe, you make an important point. Not necessarily with respect to Trump, but certainly in regards of the Republican party. The Republicans followed a strategy of intentional and complete obstruction during the eight years of the Obama administration. The openly declared goal was to prevent Obama and the Democrats from accomplishing anything. And the again openly declared objective was to make things really bad, and have the electorate blame Obama and the Democrats. This is well documented in public statements by Republican leaders. Consequently, even if one believes that Trumps campaign of kick out the Washington insiders touched on some truths, it was way off in that it targeted the wrong people.

Philippe Collard

7 years ago #16

#20
@Harvey Lloyd, what I stated is very simple: no more mr. nice guy. We simply need to fight, be as obstructive to whatever Trump and his mignons will do as they have been to Obama. Not kissing and making up. No cooperation whatsoever. The strategy of exclusion that worked so well for the right and the far right must be adapted and used by the progressive movement. And, if it was to me, it would go like this: Yes, if you voted for Trump, you voted for a sexist pig, a liar, a mysogin, a xenophob, someone who stole from countless people and businesses, someone who is a sexual predator, an incompetent con man who is going to destroy many years of progress, with the help of Ryan and McConnell. Because you voted for this scum bag, you espouse and associated to what he his. And, yes, very much so, it makes you deplorable. Yes, it makes you a racist. Yes, it makes you someone who believes "grabbing women by the pussy" is OK...because if you did not think that, then you would not have voted for this ass hole. See, these are binary disqualifier. No shades of gray. For decades the rights (and that includes you with the pejorative use of the word "liberal" which btw is based on liberty) have trashed the very idea of being a progressive...it is time for us to return the favor. You, Trumpsters, are bigots, alt-right, fascist. You are because you voted for one. And you voted for going backward. You voted that climate change is not real. You voted that women cannot have an abortion. You voted that gay people cannot marry. You basically voted an old white suppremacist agenda. And that deserve no respect. It deserves to be fought by whatever means. . And it is actually going to impact the very people who voted for that scum bag. But as a very famous politician once worte, if you do not even realize that you are being used, you do not deserve your freedom. So if you are one of the people who voted for Trump, then yes you are deplorable. And I have no respect for you.

John Rylance

7 years ago #15

Jim I agree with your comments. I will just add your picture of Trump reminds me of entrants in a gurning competition. If you are not aware of them they were probably still are competitions for who could pull the most grotesque face, often made through a horse's collar. Mind you looking at the picture that comes with my posts who am l to talk/write.

Harvey Lloyd

7 years ago #14

#19
Wow, clearly you are not one of the uneducated white people, as described in the media. So revolution is the answer when liberal agendas become afoul of the election process? Do you really believe, based on your assertions, Trump will shred the Constitution, while in the purview of the States, Legislative Branch and Supreme Court? Will you not be available to insure that civil rights are not smashed, i will. By what definition do you refer to fringe? The vote was fairly close when we look at popular vote. I don't see either side as a fringe. 82+ million folks voted, for debate purposes assuming a 50% split, you are saying approx 40 million represent a fringe? So in your diatribe are you not "casting out large chunks of the population"? Maybe a look at the voting demographic is in order here. Who voted for Trump? Females 42% Males 52% 65+ 53%, age 30-44 42% White 58%, Asian 29%, Hispanic 29% Black 8%.............http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37889032 So if we are to read your comment and look at, say, just the females, we should stop all 30+ million of these "fringe" females by doing what? Maybe before one takes up a keyboard you should review the facts of the election. The very people you "deplore" are the demographic you are trying to protect. But maybe it's not people we are trying to protect, maybe it's an ideal? Our maybe, just maybe, it's the inability to reach our own conclusions of our surroundings. Signed, a rural , deplorable, American, proud of our way of life and government, white male who respects everyone regardless of how described.

Philippe Collard

7 years ago #13

#7
Peacefull transition of power. Unifying the country. Not so fast. The US (my adopted country) elected (though not by the popular vote...another extraordinary example that, no, the US system is NOT the best in the world) a racist pig, who treats women like objects, who is a con artist, a fraud, with proto-fascist tendency, who has no knowledge of the world and terrifying positions on just about everything. He was brought to power with an ultra divisive message: "us" (the good WHITE men...forget the women) versus "them": the muslims, the mexicans, the intelectuals, the scientists, the people who believe in progress, the african american and the list goes on. After spending 18 months casting large chunks of the population as unworthy or outright parasites, you simply cannot ask for "unity". A certain fringe of America got what they wanted. By doing so they decided to ignore the fact that this scum bag is uterly unfit to be where he will be: the White House. Furthermore, he has promised to undo years of progress and, with the help of the Republican Congress, push and probably enact an ultra reactionnary agenda! Unity. Are you kidding me! But wait, yes, liberals and progressives need to unite and stop "playing nice" or by the rules. As we just witnessed, it does not work. So let us go out there and kick ass. Let us resist. Let us make sure this dangerous idiot is prevented from destroying America. So kissing and making up. NO FUCKING WAY. It is time to stop Trump, the people who voted for him and what they all represent: trying to crush progress and sending us back to a time where the "white man" was all powerful!

Milos Djukic

7 years ago #12

People are precious, irrespective of their location or dislocation. That's what I learned here. People are not products. People are much deeper than stereotypes. We have survived. , You are a person of exceptional wisdom.

Paul Walters

7 years ago #11

Jim Murray Ah Jim spoken like a true marketing/ advertising man! Down the track MBA classes will be taught two major issues that occurred in 2016 Brexit and this election. As someone who has led consumers into buying things they don't actually want or indeed need, I see the parrallels so clearly. Anyway, who wants to believe the truth when half the population want change. have a look at Australian politics over the last five to six years . State governments turfed out after one term with a 60% swing against the sitting party. Five prime Ministers in five years. You can lead horses to water and , yes you CAN make them drink!

Jim Murray

7 years ago #10

#10
You American slay me. I could easily become a slum landlord with all the requests I'm getting for enough space to just squat.

Jim Murray

7 years ago #9

#11
As long as there's a lot of material for the Daily Show and Last Week tonight, I don't give a toot.

Randy Keho

7 years ago #8

This promises to be the most interesting cabinet ever assembled, accompanied by the most political ass-kissing ever imagined. I can't wait to see who will be the guest of honor at the first state dinner. Gen. George Patton's dinner with the Russians at the conclusion of World War II, as portrayed in the award-winning movie, "Patton," comes to mind.

David B. Grinberg

7 years ago #7

#8
One other thing, Jim, I found it interest that, according to news reports last night, the web site of the Canadian immigration office crashed shortly after the results were coming to light. So, do me a favor, please save me a small corner in your basement or "crawl space" for an air mattress just in case. Remember, I'm a "glass half full" guy by nature -- at least until proved wrong. Thanks.

David B. Grinberg

7 years ago #6

Picking up where I left off below (no pun intended), I think Trump, Hillary and Obama have all made the types of conciliatory statements needed to being people together now that the electorate has spoken. Thus, with the election over and Trump being the President-elect, let's give him the so-called "benefit of the doubt" to fix the multitude of problems ailing America. If he proves otherwise, than I'll be the first to condemn and cast blame. But until then, let's see what he and a Republican Congress can accomplish for America after 8-years of a Democrat President.

Jim Murray

7 years ago #5

#7
Can't disagree with any of that . And the simple fact of the matter is that it's your government and I believe that the adage, "People alwasty get the government they deserve." holds as true here as it always have. This time around you have the advantage of "entertainment".

David B. Grinberg

7 years ago #4

Jim, as an America who did not support either President-elect Trump or Hillary, let me offer a few thoughts: 1) The time for playing the blame game, finger wagging, demonizing and castigating the candidates is now OVER! 2) One of the great things about American democracy -- in addition to peaceful transitions of power -- is that the nation comes together and unites because we are all Americans. 3) Having worked in the White House and Congress in a former life, I can tell you that politics is dirty business and always has been. Thus, nothing new there. 4) The only constant in life IS CHANGE, as I often say. This election showed that most American voters are mad as hell at the Washington, DC political establishment and won't take it anymore. 5) A lot of promises and other things are said during campaign that do NOT come to fruition once a politician takes office. This is because campaigning and governing are two animals which are mutually exclusive. To wit: President Obama campaigned in 2008 on closing Guantanamo Bay. Well, guess what, it's still open. This is just one of many historical examples. 6) History tells us the Founding Fathers of America wanted a small central government which most powers delegated the states. However, just the opposite has occurred over time with the co-called Imperial Presidency. 7) I think the Founding Father would welcome a non-career politician to the Oval Office who has unique global business experience and international experience with trade and economics. 8) Presidential politics is all about political cycles with radical pendulum swings. Just as Obama was the polar opposite of Bush, Trump is the polar opposite of Obama. When America swings too far to the left or right, it almost always swings back the other way.

Jim Murray

7 years ago #3

#5
The proof will be in the pudding. The stock marketed didn't collapse, and if he brings the right people in it could work. Thanks Ben Pinto

don kerr

7 years ago #2

The sun will come up tomorrow and the day after. Now, the day after that - I ain't so sure! Sheesh. The triumph of the ignorant and disaffected vs. the elite & parochial. Kind of a no-win proposition if you ask me - which nobody did nor will. Good luck America. Hey, you survived Nixon and Harding and George W. and Hoover. See you on the flip side and stay strong.

Kevin Pashuk

7 years ago #1

It really was a brand vs. brand issue. Martin Lindstrom in his book "Small Data" describes key motivators to promote brands in different regions of the world. He works internationally supporting major brands. When it comes to the US, he points out (and he is an outsider) that the key drivers for brand success in the US is how well they speak to two attributes - Fear, and Security. Sounds like the Trump brand - he was short on policy, but promised change (for the better) in these areas. Clinton's campaign offered a better version of the status quo.

Articles from Jim Murray

View blog
11 months ago · 2 min. reading time

As the 21st century really starts to take hold, one of the most important places where huge differen ...

11 months ago · 4 min. reading time

The last couple of decades in the life of planet Earth have been very strange ones indeed. · As a wr ...

1 year ago · 2 min. reading time

Two years ago I returned home from a four month ordeal that included major spinal surgery, that took ...

Related professionals

You may be interested in these jobs

  • Grand Development Group

    bookkeeper

    Found in: Talent CA 2 C2 - 16 hours ago


    Grand Development Group Calgary, Canada

    Education: · Expérience: · Education · College/CEGEP · or equivalent experience · Work setting · Willing to relocate · Tasks · Calculate and prepare cheques for payroll · Calculate fixed assets and depreciation · Keep financial records and establish, maintain and balance variou ...

  • Ross

    Associate General Counsel

    Found in: beBee S2 CA - 2 weeks ago


    Ross Montreal, Canada Full time

    Friday, March 15, 2024 · Why Work at Ross Video? We have a great group of people working together to create and deliver cutting edge products that look amazing and are easy to use. We go all out so that our customers can have the best possible experience and achieve quality resu ...

  • Walmart Canada

    Distribution Centre Team Associate

    Found in: beBee S2 CA - 4 weeks ago


    Walmart Canada Cornwall, Canada Full time

    Position Summary... · Responsible for the receiving, order filling and shipment of freight into and out of the DC.What you'll do... · With an enterprise as large as Walmart Canada, success means more than just the bottom line. It means constantly improving our processes, reducing ...