Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago · 2 min. reading time · 0 ·

Blogging
>
Graham🐝 blog
>
Blockchain and recreational marijuana...

Blockchain and recreational marijuana...

I was recently sitting across the table from an associate who is trying to raise money for a couple of ventures she's involved with and as part of the conversation she said (with a sigh), "If it doesn't have the word blockchain or marijuana in the title of the pitch deck no one cares. Blockchain and recreational marijuana is all anyone wants to talk about".

d82893f3.pngIf you aren't aware, Canada is planning to legalize recreational marijuana July 1st of this year (although the Senate is already saying maybe August), and the speculation and preparation is at a fevered pitch — personally I think when it finally does become legal the shakeout from a business perspective will turn everything into one big hot mess. Blockchain though is something very different — although admittedly I was struggling to understand its potential other than the platform that allowed for the crazy speculation that surrounds bitcoin and its cryptocurrency cousins.

By nature I am not a "tech guy" and rarely an early adopter, but it became apparent after talking to other people (and the recent deal between the social media platform beBee and a blockchain company called Profede) I needed to have a deeper understanding of what blockchain is, and more importantly what blockchain can do.

I wanted to ensure that if I missed any opportunity it wasn't because I was too lazy to become more knowledgeable. 

I've done a fair bit of research so far and I'm just starting to glean the potential of blockchain, although I'm still blind to most of it — I definitely have come to understand why people say it's the next iteration of the Internet though. There will probably be a great many holes in my thinking about blockchain but I wanted to make an attempt at articulating what it is, and more importantly, what it can do. And I think it's best to start with the internet.

The thing about the internet as we know it today is everything can be copied... over, and over, and over again — and because of this the content of the internet has been "devalued" to a point it has no innate value, as well as virtually no level of trust associated with it. Is that beautiful photograph the original or the millionth copy?

Blockchain allows for both trust and value to be created on the internet.

Using very complicated math and a decentralized network of computers, a public ledger can be created that offers what I call "immutable uniqueness" — it allows for the creation of something that can not be copied and is verified (and policed) by a public, decentralized system of users. The need for a third party trust institution (such as a bank)to ensure a transaction is honest is no longer needed. This I understood right away, but frankly I didn't want to be caught up in the very big turf war that is brewing between the currently trust establishments and something so very disruptive.

What I didn't appreciate was blockchain also allows you to create "ecosystems" (economic systems, not ecological systems)

The bi-product of a system that offers "immutable uniqueness" is that it creates something which can be given "immutable value". And I suppose you might as well call it currency because it is inherently used as a reward for any effort in the ecosystem — bitcoin miners are rewarded for all their computer power, brains, and involvement with bitcoin. Blockchain enables ecosystems to be created which allow you, through your "efforts and involvement in that ecosystem" to create currency from the system that unto itself has value — much like a country's economy is reflected in the value of it's currency.

And one last concept that ties this all together — fiat currency.

Fiat currency is defined as a currency established as money by government regulation or law or an ecosystem, and is derived from the Latin fiat ("let it become", "it will become") — simply put, it's a currency that is worth what it is worth because we have decided to believe it is so. How else would you explain bitcoin having a value of $12,804 as I type this?

My biggest problem now is that I'm not imaginative enough to grasp all the ecosystems that blockchain will create — something that is now on my immediate to-do list.

iamgpe

PS: I may be looking at this all wrong, so any help in this regard would be appreciated.


"
Comments

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #20

#27
Thanks for the insight Jerry Fletcher... I agree, I don't think the middlemen will go into the night quietly... I also agree that it's important to know as much as possible. I am laughing as I look for that pony because it's starting to get very big, and very messy. g

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #19

#26
Hi Phil Friedman... I think some of this discussion starts galvanizing positions regarding "centralization" versus ""decentralization" — and this gets real philosophical and social regarding where people stand. It definitely brings out the libertarian in me.. lol. I think the term "cryptocurrency" actually clouds the discussion regarding something that now can be given "immutable value" because of blockchain — I don't think it's truly reflective to ground it against the way we currently "regulate" our money. There are many exchanges that are used to trade things of defined value... metal, jewels, etc. With that said, if you want to use "blockchain" in a decentralized way you need to have some sort of "value token" associated with it to ensure the "ecosystem" functions... and as a by-product it now can be given a value (and traded). What that value is, well the concept of fiat currency comes into play, but I also think it eventually will reflect the "ecosystem" it's associated with. If you want to use blockchain centrally (as we know banks are already getting into) it will bring them greater efficiency I suspect, and probably displace so current "trust functions"... i.e. various auditors. Will check out the #ShiftTheParadigm. Hope all is well my friend.

Jerry Fletcher

6 years ago #18

With a name like Blockchain it is going to get ugly. The only situations I've seen that the middleman argument applies to is the music industry and the publishing industry. there are alternatives to the middlemen approach including those such as Taylor Swift's ability to dictate terms. The concept of replacing middlemen is, in my view, a kind of geek speak showing complete lack of understanding of human nature. In any market there are always buyers and sellers. Because they don't know each other or have the ability to scout one another out or a host of other reasons middlemen surface. Everybody wants to get paid for their contribution to solving the problem and folks are happy to pay the price for the solution. BUT that doesn't apply to top notch consultants. My research going back close to 20 years shows that the essential element in building a practice is networking in the early days which generates referrals as the business matures. At maturity they are referral based. The top consultants in the Pacific Northwest (my client base) never use paid middlemen to acquire business. My caution to all is get as much information as you can about this technology but look hard at what they are saying. I'm pretty sure there is a pony in here under all this manure.

Phil Friedman

6 years ago #17

Graham\ud83d\udc1d Edwards - I understand what you are saying. However, I am concerned by the confusion between blockchain management of data, which has to do with public verification of data and is independent of crypto-currency creation. The latter has to do with undermining the control of monetary exchange that is exercised by national governments and central banks. What also concerns me is a blatant lack of common sense about all this. I also understand your point about social media platforms profiting from the contributed work of users and members, without any benefit accruing to those who produce the work. However, again, that has nothing to do with blockchain management of data. As a matter of fact, I am currently involved in a project that is #ShiftingTheParadigm for professional and small-business networking, one in which platform members will own the platform in the same way as the policyholders of mutual insurance company own the company that insures them. Such members will benefit monetarily directly from operating surpluses generated, which will be distributed back to members in the form of credits against premium services involving enterprise activities on the platform and in the real-world bridge-spaces that the network creates. You will, for example, be able to publicly showcase some of your work with teasers and links back to a private space created on the platform (or by you separately) where you can create a paywall to collect directly from those who are sufficiently interested in your work to pay for access to it. Check out the concept at OpenWorldNorthAmerica.Org at: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6371189083519148032 https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6368644586469937152 Cheers!

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #16

#10
Thanks for the insights Harvey Lloyd... I will not be surprised if the guy who came up with Etherium rises to Bill Gates status. The inventors always get their due.... and currently it seems to be all in the virtual world.

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #15

#8
Thanks for the comment and insights Javier \ud83d\udc1d beBee I am very excited to participate in the evolution of beBee.

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #14

#5
Thanks for your perspectives and possible uses of blockchain Ren\u00e9e \ud83d\udc1d Cormier

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #13

#3
Part 2 Let's suppose (and we will use beBee because we are currently on it) that beBee is build on blockchain. Because it is, this conversation, the content, the fact we are handsome fellas, that we are active on the platform, and we have a number of people engaging with us — we generate 10 buzz dollars each for our efforts. 5 of those buzz dollars go back into fuelling the platform and 5 buzz dollars into our beBee bank account. These are buzz dollars we can use as we see fit — invest back into the platform and our efforts, trade for stuff or take our currency into the open market and trade it for other currencies... be it the crypto currencies or USD. And today you can trade 1 buzz dollar for 4 USDs. So our professional data and activity has earned us 20 USD each. Currently this is how I see tangible value being given to our "professional data" because of blog chain. I'm not looking at this transactional where I give you this and you pay me this — I see it as involvement in an "ecosystem" that can generate tangible value with our intangible "professional data" That's all I got so far. Hope all is well,

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #12

#4
Hey Phil Friedman... always great to have you part of the conversation as I appreciate your perspective. As I mentioned I'm trying to understand all of this "blockchain stuff"... frankly to get involved or go do other things. I will try to answer your question as I am seeing it (for right or wrong) But first I can't help poke at your B2B and P2B thoughts — yes I agree that the actual business transaction doesn't involve a middleman (or shouldn't, like you suggest) but it will be hard to convince me that the bank that cashes all those cheques you get, and manages all of the other aspects of money management isn't a middleman. If they aren't the biggest middlemen around I don't know who is. Blockchain can change all of that (in theory) — but as I mentioned I see that as a big turf war against the establishment and I will leave that to others. Regarding the "professional data" aspect and my current perspective looks at "professional data" in a broader sense — mostly because I don't see what others have suggested but that doesn't mean it's not valid because I still don't "get it". Let me paint a future scenario that speaks to creating tangible value from our "professional data". Part 1

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #11

#2
Thanks for the comment Pascal Derrien. I think this challenging because it is a big shift in how things are done and our world is shifting more and more into a virtual setting. I think the hype of speculating around bitcoin has created a discussion of investment and speculation of cryptocurrency instead of understanding how block chain can be used. Last time I looked there were over 1,300 cryptocurrencies and when you look a many of the companies you can't help asking the question, "other than mining your cryptocurrency" what else do you do. But that doesn't apply to all of them and I think it's these companies that are looking at the utility of block chain. For right or wrong these are the thoughts that are forming in my little peanut head.

Graham🐝 Edwards

6 years ago #10

#1
Thanks for the comment — I totally buy into Warren's intrinsic value investing philosophies and I don't disagree that bitcoin (in particular) will will go the way of the big tulip bulb crash of 1637... one day people said tulip bulbs were worth a bunch and then one day they said it wasn't. Granted tulip bulbs are worth more than zero but sure not 10,000 guilders. Like most value investors I suspect Warren isn't interested in any investment that doesn't have intrinsic value that he can measure... My thinking is that the ecosystem's that are build on block change with have a value that can be measured and create a currency that is reflective of something less speculative. Again, I'm trying to understand all of this.

Phil Friedman

6 years ago #9

#14
Well, that confirms Warren Buffet is a smart man. :-) Cheers!

Phil Friedman

6 years ago #8

#12
and Graham - the following question is posed here: "Fiat currency is ... a currency that is worth what it is worth because we have decided to believe it is so. How else would you explain bitcoin having a value of $12,804 as I type this?" As I see it, fiat currencies have underlying value because they are, in most nations, the only legal tender that can be used in satisfaction of purchases of real goods and services and debts. For example, legally, if you want to purchase real goods and services in the U.S., you must by law (fiat) use U.S.dollars. The same is true in Canada, where you must use Canadian dollars. In the EEC things are a bit confused as many countries recognize the Euro in addition to the nation's native currency. Cryptocurrencies, like BitCoin, however, are not legal currencies and are not mandated to be accepted in satisfaction of debt or in sales transactions involving real good and services. Cryptocurrencies appear to take their value from the expectation on the part of those who buy and hold them that they will continue to appreciate in value. A lot like parimutuel betting and various ponzi schemes -- and, for that matter, like the contemporary stock markets -- where value is based solely on the belief that the currency or token will rise in value due to buyer demand. Unfortunately, like the stock markets, cryptocurrency speculation is a zero -sum game, that is, in order for someone to win, someone has to lose. And in the end, the question is who will have a chair when the music stops and who will be left standing, holding their X#X#X in their hand. IMO. Cheers!

Phil Friedman

6 years ago #7

#5
“... [Blockchain] really is about protecting your privacy and ensuring you have complete control over your information and intellectual property. “ Have you considered that the first time you fill out an application for a loan ir mortgage, you put most, if not all of that information in the hands if a third party who may or may not takes adequate steps to maintain your privacy and security?

Harvey Lloyd

6 years ago #6

Some comments here and across other platforms appear to be placing a lot of emphases on the value of an individuals information. Specifically as it applies to "middle persons" profiting from the database. Blockchain is being offered as a way for the individual to control this value. A database such as visas or a recruiting style website might be worth millions, but if we break it down to my personal data or materials whats it worth? My value lies within what someone is willing to pay for the product or service directly. The information i produce as a result of that transaction is not millions, and probably in the less than ten dollar zone, probably pennies. Blockchain may help me with secure transactions but it is difficult for me to believe that blockchain is going to be free. The servers, electricity and maintenance of such machines is costing someone money. It will have to be recovered in someway. My sense is that blockchain represents the movement of wealth from one platform to another. Within this movement we may see some benefit in the real world, but the main winners will be those who created the system.

Harvey Lloyd

6 years ago #5

This post encouraged me to dig a little deeper into block chain and get a better basic view/understanding. Although the technology is way above my head with its techie backbone. I quickly began to understand its benifits, but not what one would think. Its being built as a way to install trust into a transaction. I am always leery when folks use the word trust. Currently we have people all along the way from a service or product to the consumer. Different transactions include historical data. Houses, cars and other hard assets have history. This history is kept by humans and in some cases manipulated by humans. Bank data when considering that the same dollar may be kept on multiple ledgers as it crosses oceans, states or counties. In essence human error and fraud can occur across this vast number of ledgers. In come the auditors. The reconciliation of all the ledgers to equal out to what the main ledgers states. Blockchain is designed to eliminate the human factor between input and output. Reducing the number of ledgers, humans and auditors allows the system to self audit by multiple machines with code to compare, authenticate and approve the transaction at the speed of digits. Those are the benifits. In listening and reading credentialed experts though it became apparent that the input still leaves in the hands of humans, the ability to alter the original transaction. Not necessarily maliciously. But given supply chain quality, each step requires that a human verify the origin and acceptance of the materials or products as being genuine. In each of these steps we can see where trust can be broken. I believe blockchain may offer some support for verified transactions and speed. I would suggest though that if we continue to eliminate the jobs that blockchain and other nifty practices reduce. Who will be using the system?
The market is currently developed and designed in a way that big corporations monopolize the market whilst intermediaries control how data is exchanged and managed. It’s time for a shake-up in which those actually using the services gain the power back. When the power is with the user, they are able to control their own personal and professional data in a manner that benefits them. They can control the level of privacy, who can access their data and benefit from the exchange of their data to businesses or other professionals. Users have the direct access to receive customized offers from other professionals or businesses as well as receiving money for the exchange of their details to receive these offers. Blockchain and decentralized technologies make it possible for users to make money from the exchange of their data. 6 Reasons Why Blockchain Will Change The World https://www.bebee.com/producer/@juan-imaz/6-reasons-why-blockchain-will-change-the-world beBee has signed an agreement with Profede https://www.bebee.com/producer/@javierbebee/bebee-has-signed-an-agreement-with-profede Advantages for Professionals Professionals typically have their professional profiles on Linkedin, as well as other professional social networks and job portals. Thanks to Profede's protocol: ● Professionals will be able to control their own data: They decide who can access their data and which parts of it. ● Professionals will get compensated for the exchange of their data. ● Professionals set their own price and therefore will feel fairly compensated every time a business gets in touch with them. ● Professionals have a portable professional profile and reputation. They will not need to rely on a centralized platform.

Phil Friedman

6 years ago #3

Graham\ud83d\udc1d Edwards -- I read the following recently on LinkedIn: "[X is a blockchain-driven] Platform That Allows Direct Professional-to-Business and Professional-to-Professional Interactions, Without The Need For Intermediaries ..." And I immediately thought, hey, that's great; I'm all in favor of eliminating parasitic middle-men. But then, I thought, wait, what middle-men? I have been operating for more than 25 years selling and delivering professional-to-business (P2B) services and business-to-business (B2B) services WITHOUT ANY MIDDLE-MEN. So what the heck are they talking about? I have, at times, tried the consulting-gig generating services such as those run at one time by job-sites like Monster.com and Hot Jobs. But with zero results -- which is probably why those forays into the creation of contracting middle-men quickly faded from existence. Same for writing gig intermediary marketing services. Zero results -- apparently because I don't write for a fraction of a penny per word. No professional or business selling and delivering services needs to work through a middle-man. Unless, I suppose, you're somebody who doesn't have a clue how to run a business yourself -- in which case, why would anyone hire you to advise them on how to run theirs? (continued Pt II below)

Phil Friedman

6 years ago #2

Pt. II - Graham No, Graham, we can't be talking about B2B or P2B. We have to be talking about the field of professional recruitment, in which recruiting firms collect the data of potential candidates, winnow it down, and present a distilled set of likely candidates to an employer seeking to hire somebody. And if that's what we're talking about, then I can only say good luck. Blockchain, schmockchain, when was the last time you paid a cover charge to enter a merchant's store in order to shop? Why would a potential employer pay someone to look at their resume? It's a crock. The only thing I can think of is that we're talking about being able to charge for all of the advice and experienced-based opinion many of us publish on social/professional media for nothing. And a desire to begin charging for all that valuable P2B and B2B content. Well, if so, we could all do that now by publishing on Medium or WordPress or similar and placing the content behind a paywall. There are hundreds of scientific data archives that do it now. And news organizations. And newspapers and magazines. If you want to read, you have to pay. So I just don't get what we're talking about with blockchain management of "professional data". And I keep asking, but nobody is saying. Cheers!

Pascal Derrien

6 years ago #1

#1
agree with Chris a lot of hype and blind optimism on the topic at the moment. from the experts I would expect a bit less conversation and a bit more action in showing concretely and explaining concretely an end to end process and its value in plain English not spin English... I think that's why most of us struggle :-)

Articles from Graham🐝 Edwards

View blog
2 years ago · 3 min. reading time

In my part of the world the COVID-19 pandemic has become manageable and the normality of working alo ...

1 year ago · 1 min. reading time

One of the simplest examples of a Sacred Cow can be found when you write blogs because there’s a sma ...

1 year ago · 2 min. reading time

Before I take you on a metaphorical journey, I wanted to mention two very important truisms that I w ...

Related professionals

You may be interested in these jobs

  • Aftec

    Administrateur réseaux et systèmes

    Found in: Talent CA C2 - 5 days ago


    Aftec Laval, Canada Alternance

    Le campus AFTEC RENNES propose de multiples formations Post Bac à Bac +5, en alternance ou en initiale, dans différents domaines : gestion des entreprises, communication, gestion immobilières, commerce, management, comptabilité, logistique. L'ensemble des titres sont validés par ...

  • Kramer Direct Ltd.

    mechanical engineer

    Found in: Talent CA 2 C2 - 2 hours ago


    Kramer Direct Ltd. Calgary, Canada

    Education: · Expérience: · Education · Bachelor's degree · Work setting · Engineering firm · Tasks · Conduct research into the feasibility, design, operation and performance of mechanisms, components and systems · Supervise and inspect the installation of mechanical systems · D ...

  • GoodLife Fitness

    Manager of Events and Events Experience

    Found in: Talent CA C2 - 4 days ago


    GoodLife Fitness Toronto, Canada Full time

    Title · Manager of Events & Event Experience · Reports to · Director of Business Growth · Department · canfitpro - Events Department · Effective Date · November 24, 2023 · Core Values, Purpose and Vision · At canfitpro, we live and breathe our Core Values of Caring Community, C ...